<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bringing Streetcars back to DC, part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metcaffeination.net/weblog/2008/10/29/bringing-streetcars-back-to-dc-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metcaffeination.net/weblog/2008/10/29/bringing-streetcars-back-to-dc-part-1/</link>
	<description>cities. physics. food. environment. fatherhood.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:52:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bringing streetcars back to DC, part 3 &#8212; metcaffeination</title>
		<link>http://metcaffeination.net/weblog/2008/10/29/bringing-streetcars-back-to-dc-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3814</link>
		<dc:creator>Bringing streetcars back to DC, part 3 &#8212; metcaffeination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metcaffeination.net/weblog/?p=144#comment-3814</guid>
		<description>[...] Parts 1 and 2 of this series looked at the public side of the DC Alternatives Analysis process that took place between 2002 and 2005. Several newsletters were published, public meetings were held, and the study team met with civic groups and maintained a presence at various community events. The widely distributed documents only tell a small fraction of the story, and if one wants to understand why the final report had such disappointing recommendations, one needs to delve into the more technical study documents, which weren&#8217;t widely distributed. The contrast between that which was published publicly and the technical documents kept internally is instructive for anyone following a similar engineering study of similar scale. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Parts 1 and 2 of this series looked at the public side of the DC Alternatives Analysis process that took place between 2002 and 2005. Several newsletters were published, public meetings were held, and the study team met with civic groups and maintained a presence at various community events. The widely distributed documents only tell a small fraction of the story, and if one wants to understand why the final report had such disappointing recommendations, one needs to delve into the more technical study documents, which weren&#8217;t widely distributed. The contrast between that which was published publicly and the technical documents kept internally is instructive for anyone following a similar engineering study of similar scale. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bringing Streetcars back to DC, part 2 &#8212; metcaffeination</title>
		<link>http://metcaffeination.net/weblog/2008/10/29/bringing-streetcars-back-to-dc-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3297</link>
		<dc:creator>Bringing Streetcars back to DC, part 2 &#8212; metcaffeination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metcaffeination.net/weblog/?p=144#comment-3297</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 1 of this series looked at the beginnings of the DC government&#8217;s effort to expand the transit network. We left off in the Spring of 2005, having been to several meetings and having received several newsletters. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 1 of this series looked at the beginnings of the DC government&#8217;s effort to expand the transit network. We left off in the Spring of 2005, having been to several meetings and having received several newsletters. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
