cities. physics. food. environment. fatherhood.
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Twenty megawatts in your hands

I needed to buy more gasoline for the car today, and I decided to see how long it took to fill the tank. I bought ten and a half gallons of gas, and it took 70 seconds to fill it up. Although filling up a gas tank is something that millions of Americans do every day, it’s really remarkable when you stop and think about the energy transfer going on.

Gasoline has, approximately, 113,000 BTUs per gallon.1 One BTU is 1055 Joules. So I transferred 1.25 Billion Joules in those 70 seconds, which is a rate of 17.9 megawatts. When you consider that you spend less than two minutes pumping the same amount of energy you burn in four hours of driving, it’s not surprising that you end up with such a high power. What’s more interesting, I think, is to contemplate the rather fundamental limits this puts on plug-in electric cars.

Internal combustion engines, according to Wikipedia, are only about 20% efficient, which is to say, for every 100 BTUs of thermal energy consumed by the engine, you get 20 BTUs of mechanical energy out. This is, in large part, a consequence of fundamental thermodynamics. Although electric motors can be pretty close to perfectly efficient, a similar thermal-to-electric efficiency hit would be taken at the power plant.

Let’s consider, then, that we want a similar car to mine, but electric. Instead of 1.25 gigajoules, we need to have 250 megajoules. Battery charging can be pretty efficient, at 90% or so, which means we’d supply 280 megajoules. If we expect the filling-up time to be comparable to that of gasoline cars–call it 100 seconds for simplicity–then we’d need to supply 2.8 megawatts of power. At 240 Volts, which is the voltage we get in our homes, this would require 11700 amps; if you used 1000 Volts, it would take 2800 amps. Although equipment exists2 to handle these voltage and current levels, it is an understatement to say that it cannot be handled as casually as gasoline pumps are handled. Nor is it clear that any battery system would actually be able to accept this much power.

A linear relationship exists between the power requirement for filling, and the vehicle range, the vehicle power, and the time for a filling. If you’re satisfied with half the range of a regular vehicle, for example, you could use half the filling power. Let’s imagine that you’d be happy for the filling to take ten times as long as with gasoline, or 1000 seconds, just under 17 minutes. At this level, you’d need 280 kilowatts of power. If battery charging is 90% efficient, that means 10% of the power is going to be dissipated as heat, which in this case would be 28 kilowatts.

For comparison, a typical energy consumption rate for a home furnace is 100,000 BTU per hour, about 28 BTU per second, or 29.3 kilowatts. Which means that the waste heat dissipated during charging for the example–of a 1000 second fill for a vehicle with similar range and power as a modest gasoline powered sedan, at 90% charging efficiency–is as much as the entire output of a home furnace.

No wonder overnight charges are the standard.

  1. Summer and winter blends have slightly more and less, respectively. []
  2. think about how large the wires would need to be []

4 comments

1 Michael Perkins { 11.14.08 at 2:25 pm }

Thanks for the calculation. I did one on my site with similar results. I didn’t look into the heat dissipation aspect, though, which was interesting.

2 Ken Monahan { 11.14.08 at 5:16 pm }

Can you give me an idea of what the scale economies would be? Presumably massive power plants create energy from fossil fuels more efficiently than do internal combustion engines and so by making all cars electric you should be transferring those scale economies to the drivers of cars or is there some ineffciency in the use of electric motors or in transmission of power that would negate the savings?

3 thm { 11.15.08 at 12:00 am }

You’re limited by what’s known as the Carnot efficiency for any case, which is the thermodynamic upper limit for the efficiency of creating mechanical energy, or electricity, from heat. It depends on how hot you can burn, and how cold you can exhaust at. According to Wikipedia, the theoretical limit for a steel engine would be 37% efficient; to get higher efficiency you’d need temperatures hotter than steel can handle. But with clever engineering, modern combined cycle power plants, burning natural gas, can get efficiencies of 60%. Old coal-fired plants are probably only marginally better than car engines.

That said, electric motors really are much better than gasoline motors. The efficiency of gasoline motors depends strongly on what speed they’re running at; this is why cars need transmissions. are estimated at around 7%.

I’m not sure what role electric cars should play, but (re-)electrification of our railroads is a very good idea.

4 thm { 11.15.08 at 9:11 am }

Leave a Comment